December 2022
AIIB ASEAN ASEAN (R) ASEAN-ISIS Asia Big Tech CH: Hong Kong Country (R): Indonesia Country (R): Malaysia Country (R): Myanmar Country (R): Singapore Country: ASEAN Country: Australia Country: Cambodia Country: China Country: Germany Country: India Country: Indonesia Country: Japan Country: Laos Country: Malaysia Country: Myanmar Country: North Korea Country: Philippines Country: Qatar Country: Russia Country: Singapore Country: South Korea Country: Taiwan Country: Thailand Country: UK Country: United States Country: US Country: USA Country: Vietnam covid-19 DE: 5G DE: Data privacy DE: Data security DE: Facebook Digitalisation Elections: Indonesia 2019 Elections: Thailand 2019 ESG: Climate Change ESG: Diversity ESG: Energy ESG: Green Finance ESG: Green Growth ESG: Haze ESG: Human Rights ESG: Modern Slavery ESG: Peatland ESG: Riau ESG: Smallholders ESG: Sustainability ESG: Sustainable/Green Infrastructure European Union Event: SDSWR Events: AAF Fukushima Global Citizens Singapore Google Indonesia: Jokowi Institute: ERIA Institute: SIIA JP: Abenomics Leaders: Kim Jong Un Leaders: Lee Hsien Loong Megatrends: Populism MM: Aung San Suu Kyi MM: NLD MM: Rakhine State MY: Anwar Ibrahim MY: GE14 MY: Mahathir Mohamad MY: Najib Razak New Horizons New Zealand Nicholas Fang Oh Ei Sun Recovery Region: Latin America Region: Middle East Reports Security: South China Sea Security: Terrorism SG: Lee Kuan Yew SG: SG Secure SG: Smart Nation SG: Society Simon Tay Sustainable infrastructure Topic (R): Belt and Road Topic (R): Business Topic (R): Digitisation Topic (R): Economy Topic (R): Green Finance Topic (R): Haze Topic (R): Infrastructure Topic (R): Palm Oil Topic (R): Peatland Topic (R): Smallholders Topic (R): Sustainability Topic: Anti-Globalisation Topic: Belt and Road Topic: Business Topic: Coronavirus Topic: COVID-19 Topic: Deforestation Topic: Development Topic: Digital Economy Topic: Digitisation Topic: E-Commerce Topic: Economics Topic: Economy Topic: Elections Topic: Environment Topic: ESG Topic: Finance Topic: Global Citizens Topic: Globalisation Topic: Human Trafficking Topic: Indo-Pacific Topic: Infrastructure Topic: Investment Topic: Labour Topic: Nuclear Topic: Palm Oil Topic: Race Topic: Regional Integration Topic: Religion Topic: Security Topic: Singapore-Malaysia Relations Topic: Small States Topic: Trade Trade: AEC Trade: CPTPP Trade: FTA Trade: Multilateralism Trade: RCEP Trade: TPP Trade: War Trends (Digital): Cybersecurity UK: Brexit United States US: Obama US: Trump US: Trump WEF youth

A safe pair of hands for Germany or a stroke of good luck? Merkel and the future of Europe

20 Sep A safe pair of hands for Germany or a stroke of good luck? Merkel and the future of Europe

Angela Merkel and her CDU/CSU bloc have won a landslide victory in Sunday’s elections (22 September), with 42% of the vote, up from 34% in the last election in 2009. This means Merkel will be the third only German chancellor, after Konrad Adenauer and Helmut Kohl, to have won a third term. Analysts say the results are a solid endorsement of Merkel’s leadership and policies during the euro zone crisis.

Her coalition partners the liberal FDP, however, have failed to meet the minimum 5% threshold to enter the Bundestag. This was their worst electoral result ever, which was expected because of its tainted reputation of being captured by special industrial interests on the issue of tax breaks, as well losing its vote share to the new eurosceptic party Alternative fuer Deutschland. Merkel may thus seek a grand coalition with the main opposition SPD – though the SPD only garnered 26%, they were still placed second in the results, and are also more politically acceptable to the CDU than any other party. Negotiations on a possible coalition are expected in the ensuing weeks.

Compared to previous German federal elections, this one was the most widely watched around Europe and the world. This is because it was the first one since the bailout packages for debt ridden EU countries were first rolled out in 2010. Since then Chancellor Angela Merkel has come to be seen as the most powerful leader of the EU, as the German tax payers became the largest contributor to those bailouts. The elections will also have implications on the direction the EU will take, on issues such as the banking union, and on various legislation and reforms needed to make the euro zone work better.

Merkel stays as as chancellor

It seemed to be a foregone conclusion that Merkel’s party the CDU would win the majority in Sunday’s election, and that Merkel would remain as the German chancellor. Opinion polls showed Merkel and the CDU ahead of their closest rival, Peer Steinbrueck and the SPD.

Despite some setbacks along the way such as the loss of Lower Saxony in state elections in January 2013, as well as more recent revelations about a possible third bailout package for Greece, Merkel’s governing CDU party has held on strong. This is natural, since Germany’s reputation as the economic powerhouse of Europe actually consolidated during the course of the crisis. Its annual GDP growth rates hovered between 0.7 and 4.2% while most of the EU floundered in the negative range. Merkel is quite a popular leader, all things considered. If anything, she is not reviled at home but abroad, in countries like Greece where she is seen as responsible for imposing the austerity measures on the debtor EU countries as conditions for the bailout packages.

The key question in this coming election seemed more to be the concern over who would be Merkel’s coalition partner – or partners – in the next government, especially now that the junior coalition partner, the liberal FDP party, has failed to even garner the 5% threshold to be represented in the Bundestag. But other coalition permutations involving smaller parties are unrealistic.

A grand coalition between the CDU and the main opposition centre-left SPD might also be possible, as was the case during Merkel’s first government from 2005 to 2009. In fact a survey run in mid-August indicated 23% of respondents favoured a grand coalition, more than any other possible coalitions.  Some analysts also believed that this grand coalition would be better able to see through some of the needed measures to strengthen the Eurozone.[1]

Other alternative parties formed in recent years have not gotten much traction. The Alternative fuer Deutschland, a euro-sceptic party formed in early 2013 by a group of academics advocating German withdrawal from the euro zone, has been labelled as precisely that – a “party of professors”, a derogatory term in German politics. Meanwhile the Pirate Party, modelled after its Swedish counterpart, is still not seen as a serious political force.

The strong showing of CDU going into this election is where the political genius – or sheer pragmatism – of Merkel and the CDU can be appreciated. They have in fact moved leftwards on the political spectrum throughout their years in government, on pension policy, minimum wage and a host of social welfare issues. They have even absorbed the ground of the Green party, considered for a long time the alternative to the traditional political establishment. After the Fukushima nuclear disaster of 2011, Merkel made a policy U-turn and declared a 2022 deadline to shut down all nuclear power plants in Germany. In one fell swoop, the Greens were completely deprived of their ammunition against the CDU – a governing party not known to espouse environmental concerns so wholeheartedly.

From the “sick man of Europe” to Europe’s economic powerhouse

Much credit for Germany’s economic resilience during this stormy period must go to the previous chancellor, Gerhard Schroeder. Although he was from the centre-left SPD, Schroeder’s government saw through a painful programme of labour market reforms which have essentially made Germany what it is today. One tends to forget that during the 1990s, Germany was frequently mocked as the “sick man of Europe”, a country that suffered from economic malaise and anaemic growth in the aftermath of German reunification. Many of the underlying reasons for this continue to plague Germany today – unfavourable demographics in particular. Schroeder’s and Merkel’s programmes should therefore be rightly praised in view of these unfavourable conditions, though that is to say nothing of Germany’s prospects in the next 10 years.

While much of Germany’s current economic resilience can be attributed to the painful structural reforms, Germany has also benefitted significantly from the existence of the euro.  A study published by the Bertelsmann Stiftung in April 2013 noted that Germany’s GDP would be lower by about 0.5% points per year without the euro.  The euro has made German products much more competitive and become an important player in international competition[2].  This was reflected in the significant inroads that Germany has made into China for instance.  Another earlier study by McKinsey also showed that Germany was the main beneficiary of the euro.[3]

The Bertelsmann Stiftung’s study came amid a perception of growing disenchantment among the German public about the country’s euro membership.

The fact that Merkel and the CDU have not told the voters how much the German banks and industries have benefitted from the euro and how the Eurozone bailouts have also helped propped up some of the German banks is one of the shortcomings that may come into play in this election with possibly some support traditionally for the CDU going to the AfD, the party that runs on the single issue of pulling Germany out of the Eurozone.

But what was also surprising if the polls were to be believed, is how little EU issues have featured in the German election campaign. During the one and only TV debate Merkel had with her SPD rival Peer Steinbrueck, the latter attacked Merkel on her euro policies’ failure, which Merkel defended her policies by pointing to Germany’s healthy economy, and being the engine of growth in Europe. It was on the issue of the US vast data surveillance undertaken in Germany that Merkel fidgeted and indeed the US surveillance programme, PRISM, had dominated the election campaign over some of the EU issues.

Post-election Germany and expectations from the EU

When Merkel visited Singapore in June 2011, she gave a key speech in which she declared Germany’s strong support for and commitment to the euro zone. At that height of the crisis, that must have come across as overly idealistic. More than two years on, no one talks about the euro zone collapsing or of Greece leaving the euro zone any more – topics which were seriously mooted back in 2011. And more importantly green shoots of growth seemed to be returning to Europe.  The 2nd quarter of 2013 brought some good news that the long recession shrouding Europe is finally lifting.  Whether all this is thanks the “safe pair of hands” that has guided Germany and the EU, or to sheer luck, Angela Merkel has already made a lasting mark in German and European politics.  And Germany’s election is no longer just a national affair as other EU member states watch keenly the results of the election expecting that the outcome would have a significant impact on the future of the EU.

Some analysts, however, have cautioned against “undue expectations” on Germany. Whatever the results of the German election, it is likely that Merkel’s return to power and as German Chancellor for a third term would continue on a cautious, low key trajectory seeing itself as a “leading role model, rather than a power with obligation to lead”[4].







Dr Yeo Lay Hwee is Director of the EU Centre and a Senior Fellow of the SIIA. Loke Hoe Yeong is an Associate at the EU Centre and a Researcher at the SIIA. This commentary was originally published on the EU Centre in Singapore website on 20 September and updated following the election results.