May 2024
AIIB ASEAN ASEAN (R) ASEAN-ISIS Asia Big Tech CH: Hong Kong Country (R): Indonesia Country (R): Malaysia Country (R): Myanmar Country (R): Singapore Country: ASEAN Country: Australia Country: Cambodia Country: China Country: Germany Country: India Country: Indonesia Country: Japan Country: Laos Country: Malaysia Country: Myanmar Country: North Korea Country: Philippines Country: Qatar Country: Russia Country: Singapore Country: South Korea Country: Taiwan Country: Thailand Country: UK Country: United States Country: US Country: USA Country: Vietnam covid-19 DE: 5G DE: Data privacy DE: Data security DE: Facebook Digitalisation Elections: Indonesia 2019 Elections: Thailand 2019 ESG: Climate Change ESG: Diversity ESG: Energy ESG: Green Finance ESG: Green Growth ESG: Haze ESG: Human Rights ESG: Modern Slavery ESG: Peatland ESG: Riau ESG: Smallholders ESG: Sustainability ESG: Sustainable/Green Infrastructure European Union Event: SDSWR Events: AAF Fukushima Global Citizens Singapore Indonesia: Jokowi Institute: ERIA Institute: SIIA JP: Abenomics Leaders: Kim Jong Un Leaders: Lee Hsien Loong Megatrends: Populism MM: Aung San Suu Kyi MM: NLD MM: Rakhine State MY: Anwar Ibrahim MY: GE14 MY: Mahathir Mohamad MY: Najib Razak New Horizons New Zealand Nicholas Fang Oh Ei Sun Recovery Region: European Union Region: Latin America Region: Middle East Reports Security: South China Sea Security: Terrorism SG: Lee Kuan Yew SG: SG Secure SG: Smart Nation SG: Society Simon Tay Sustainable infrastructure Topic (R): Belt and Road Topic (R): Business Topic (R): Digitisation Topic (R): Economy Topic (R): Green Finance Topic (R): Haze Topic (R): Infrastructure Topic (R): Palm Oil Topic (R): Peatland Topic (R): Smallholders Topic (R): Sustainability Topic: Anti-Globalisation Topic: Belt and Road Topic: Business Topic: Coronavirus Topic: COVID-19 Topic: Deforestation Topic: Development Topic: Digital Economy Topic: Digitisation Topic: E-Commerce Topic: Economics Topic: Economy Topic: Elections Topic: Environment Topic: ESG Topic: Finance Topic: Global Citizens Topic: Globalisation Topic: Human Trafficking Topic: Indo-Pacific Topic: Infrastructure Topic: Investment Topic: Labour Topic: Nuclear Topic: Palm Oil Topic: Race Topic: Regional Integration Topic: Religion Topic: Security Topic: Singapore-Malaysia Relations Topic: Small States Topic: Trade Trade: AEC Trade: CPTPP Trade: FTA Trade: Multilateralism Trade: RCEP Trade: TPP Trade: War Trends (Digital): Cybersecurity UK: Brexit United States US: Obama US: Trump US: Trump WEF youth

China’s new fishing law: An ADIZ flashback?

16 Jan China’s new fishing law: An ADIZ flashback?

China’s new fishing regulations over a disputed swathe of the South China Sea took effect on 1 January, and were promptly criticised by the Philippines and Vietnam. The South-East Asian claimant states demanded that Beijing clarify the new law, which states that all foreign vessels seeking to fish or conduct surveys in those waters have to obtain approval from the “relevant and responsible department”.

The incident brought back memories of the Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), also unilaterally declared by China over parts of the East China Sea last November. Is this the ADIZ moment for the South China Sea?

There is some reason to believe otherwise. The latest fishing law was quietly passed by the Hainan Provincial People’s Congress – rather than Beijing – some time back in 2013. It only caught the attention of the region at the start of the new year, when it came into effect. This may suggest some lack of coordination between the Hainan local government and the central government in Beijing.

Questions have also been raised on China’s ability to enforce these new regulations effectively over such a vast area. It will certainly lead observers to question Beijing’s professed commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which seeks to protect the freedom of navigation in the high seas.

The fall-out from the new fishing law is unlikely to be as drastic as the ADIZ. Some observers have opined that declaring an ADIZ is within China’s sovereign right; more than 20 other countries have an ADIZ, including the US. In any event, the US stopped short of demanding a withdrawal of the ADIZ, to Japan’s disappointment.

Nonetheless, the new fishing law has raised hackles in the region yet again, and is certain to complicate ties between China and ASEAN at a crucial time, given the ongoing consultations towards a Code of Conduct (COC) for the South China Sea. If anything, this latest incident has upped the stakes for a timely and effective conclusion of the COC negotiations.


China’s New Fishing Regulations: An Act of State Piracy? [The Diplomat, 13 January 2014]

Philippines blasts China over new fishing law [Channel NewsAsia, 10 January 2014]