December 2018
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Tags
(Premium): Commentary ASEAN ASEAN (R) ASEAN-ISIS Chen Chen Lee Country (R): Indonesia Country (R): Malaysia Country (R): Myanmar Country (R): Philippines Country (R): Singapore Country: ASEAN Country: Australia Country: Cambodia Country: China Country: Germany Country: India Country: Indonesia Country: Japan Country: Laos Country: Malaysia Country: Myanmar Country: North Korea Country: Philippines Country: Qatar Country: Russia Country: Singapore Country: Singapore Country: South Korea Country: Taiwan Country: Thailand Country: UK Country: US Country: USA Country: Vietnam donald trump Elections: Indonesia 2019 Elections: Thailand 2019 European Union Event: SDSWR Events: AAF Focus CH: Hong Kong Focus JP: Abenomics Focus MM: Rakhine State Focus MY: GE14 Focus SG: SG Secure Focus SG: Smart Nation Focus SG: Society Focus TH: Protests Focus UK: Brexit Fukushima Global Citizens Singapore Institute: ERIA Institute: EU Centre in Singapore Institute: SIIA Leaders: Aung San Suu Kyi Leaders: Jokowi Leaders: Kim Jong Un Leaders: Lee Hsien Loong Leaders: Lee Kuan Yew Leaders: Mahathir Mohamad Leaders: Obama Leaders: Trump Myanmar: NLD Nicholas Fang Org: AIIB Org: G20 Region: Africa Region: Asia Region: Latin America Region: Middle East Reports Simon Tay Topic (Environment): Peatland Topic (Environment): Smallholders Topic (R): Belt and Road Topic (R): Business Topic (R): Digitisation Topic (R): E-Commerce Topic (R): Economy Topic (R): Green Finance Topic (R): Infrastructure Topic (R): Palm Oil Topic (R): Peatland Topic (R): Smallholders Topic (R): Sustainability Topic: Anti-Globalisation Topic: Belt and Road Topic: Business Topic: Development Topic: Digitisation Topic: E-Commerce Topic: Economics Topic: Elections Topic: Environment Topic: Finance Topic: Global Citizens Topic: Globalisation Topic: Green Finance Topic: Haze Topic: Human Rights Topic: Human Trafficking Topic: Infrastructure Topic: Investment Topic: Labour Topic: Nuclear Topic: Palm Oil Topic: Race Topic: Regional Integration Topic: Religion Topic: Security Topic: Small States Topic: SMEs Topic: Sustainability Topic: Sustainable/Green Infrastructure Topic: Trade Trade: AEC Trade: CPTPP Trade: FTA Trade: FTAAP Trade: Multilateralism Trade: RCEP Trade: TPP Trade: War Trends (Digital): Cybersecurity Trends (Digital): Data privacy Trends (Digital): Data security Trends (Digital): Digital Economy Trends (Digital): Digitisation Trends (Digital): Facebook Trends (Digital): New Media Trends (Digital): Smart Cities Trends (Environment): Air pollution Trends (Environment): Climate Change Trends (Environment): Energy Trends (Environment): Green Growth Trends (Environment): Hotspots Trends (Environment): Riau Trends (Environment): RSPO Trends (Environment): Sustainability Trends (Environment): Water Trends (Globalisation): ASEAN Citizens Trends (Globalisation): Populism Trends (Globalisation): Workers Rights Trends (Security): South China Sea Trends (Security): Terrorism Trends (Social): Demographics Trends (Social): Diversity United States us midterm elections WTO

Myanmar 2015 elections – what to expect?

Insights_6e8aa7fced1e46349b0cc64067650f98

28 Aug Myanmar 2015 elections – what to expect?

This year’s elections mark a significant milestone in Myanmar’s history.  There is a growing thirst for change in Myanmar, and the party that wins the popular vote will be tasked to set the tone for the future of democracy in the country. The future of Myanmar’s democratic trajectory is mainly contingent on two parties; the current ruling party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) and the National League for Democracy (NLD).

Both analysts and the Burmese public have speculated that the NLD has the potential to win in most of the contested constituencies due to popularity of NLD’s chairperson Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. However, despite her popularity, the NLD’s decision to exclude certain high profile candidates, including U Ko Ko Gyi has called into question the party’s ability to dominate the elections. The NLD’s decision to exclude him alongside others has outraged both the party’s supporters and other candidates within the NLD. This could potentially weaken the party’s unity, leading to a potential fragmentation within the NLD. As such, the NLD is now under pressure to maintain a united front, rallying support from other parties or risk the USDP forming a majority in parliament.

The ruling USDP only requires 26 per cent of parliamentary seats to form a new government, as they would be likely supported by the military. As per Myanmar’s 2008 constitution, the military holds 25 per cent of seats in parliament. As the USDP’s leadership is largely comprised of former military officers who were part of the military regime, it is extremely likely that the USDP and military would join forces to form the majority in parliament. The NLD’s ability to form its own majority in parliament is fundamentally threatened by the potential alliance between the USDP and the military.

However, President Thein Sein’s overnight decision to remove U Shwe Mann as USDP chairman – with President Thein Sein taking the chairmanship himself – has stirred a polemic debate in Myanmar, jeopardising USDP’s popularity. This might also have a positive spillover effect for the NLD, as the NLD has built a seemingly good relationship with U Shwe Mann over the past few years. U Shwe Mann is also seen as a pro-democratic leader, and the alignment between his views and the NLD could create opportunities for the NLD to win more seats in the elections. U Shwe Mann is likely to support NLD by using his remaining power in parliament as the speaker of the lower house and patron of the union parliament. In addition, he is also equipped with the knowledge to help Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in strategic planning as he is aware of the inner workings of the USDP and the military.

Myanmar’s upcoming election has been in the spotlight, garnering the attention of global observers. However, despite the potential promise that this election may hold, it is important for observers to match their expectations with the pace of Myanmar’s opening. As much as this election may be a poignant chapter in Myanmar’s history, the country’s reform process has thus far been gradual. Myanmar’s democratization process will also take time to fully mature.

Sources:

Myanmar’s Elections: Jostling for Power [The Diplomat, 20 Aug 2015]

Conservatives in Myanmar Force Out Leader of Ruling Party  [The New York Times, 13 Aug 2015]

Photo Credit:
Wikimedia Commons