April 2019
« Mar   May »
ASEAN ASEAN (R) ASEAN-ISIS Beijing Big Tech Country (R): Indonesia Country (R): Malaysia Country (R): Myanmar Country (R): Singapore Country: ASEAN Country: Australia Country: Cambodia Country: China Country: Germany Country: India Country: Indonesia Country: Japan Country: Laos Country: Malaysia Country: Myanmar Country: North Korea Country: Philippines Country: Qatar Country: Russia Country: Singapore Country: South Korea Country: Taiwan Country: Thailand Country: UK Country: United States Country: US Country: USA Country: Vietnam Digital ecosystem donald trump Elections: Indonesia 2019 Elections: Thailand 2019 European Union Event: SDSWR Events: AAF Focus CH: Hong Kong Focus JP: Abenomics Focus MM: Rakhine State Focus MY: GE14 Focus SG: SG Secure Focus SG: Smart Nation Focus SG: Society Focus TH: Protests Focus UK: Brexit Fukushima Global Citizens Singapore Google Institute: ERIA Institute: EU Centre in Singapore Institute: SIIA Leaders: Aung San Suu Kyi Leaders: Jokowi Leaders: Kim Jong Un Leaders: Lee Hsien Loong Leaders: Lee Kuan Yew Leaders: Mahathir Mohamad Leaders: Obama Leaders: Trump Myanmar: NLD Nicholas Fang Oh Ei Sun Org: AIIB Org: G20 Region: Africa Region: Asia Region: Europe Region: Latin America Region: Middle East Reports Simon Tay Topic (Environment): Peatland Topic (Environment): Smallholders Topic (R): Belt and Road Topic (R): Business Topic (R): Digitisation Topic (R): Economy Topic (R): Green Finance Topic (R): Infrastructure Topic (R): Palm Oil Topic (R): Peatland Topic (R): Smallholders Topic (R): Sustainability Topic: Anti-Globalisation Topic: Belt and Road Topic: Business Topic: Development Topic: Digitisation Topic: E-Commerce Topic: Economics Topic: Economy Topic: Elections Topic: Environment Topic: Finance Topic: Global Citizens Topic: Globalisation Topic: Green Finance Topic: Haze Topic: Human Rights Topic: Human Trafficking Topic: Indo-Pacific Topic: Infrastructure Topic: Investment Topic: Labour Topic: Nuclear Topic: Palm Oil Topic: Race Topic: Regional Integration Topic: Religion Topic: Security Topic: Singapore-Malaysia Relations Topic: Small States Topic: SMEs Topic: Sustainability Topic: Sustainable/Green Infrastructure Topic: Trade Trade: AEC Trade: CPTPP Trade: FTA Trade: FTAAP Trade: RCEP Trade: TPP Trade: War Trends (Digital): Cybersecurity Trends (Digital): Data privacy Trends (Digital): Data security Trends (Digital): Digital Economy Trends (Digital): Digitisation Trends (Digital): Facebook Trends (Digital): New Media Trends (Environment): Air pollution Trends (Environment): Climate Change Trends (Environment): Energy Trends (Environment): Green Growth Trends (Environment): Hotspots Trends (Environment): Riau Trends (Environment): RSPO Trends (Environment): Sustainability Trends (Globalisation): ASEAN Citizens Trends (Globalisation): Populism Trends (Globalisation): Workers Rights Trends (Security): South China Sea Trends (Security): Terrorism Trends (Social): Demographics United States WEF

To reclaim Philippines from Beijing’s grasp, US must look beyond the South China Sea


20 Mar To reclaim Philippines from Beijing’s grasp, US must look beyond the South China Sea

By Simon Tay
For South China Morning Post

International talk about the Philippines often focuses on the South China Sea and disputes that the country has with China. Speculation then follows about the character of, and sometimes controversial quotations from, President Rodrigo Duterte. Less notice is given to the country’s economy that continues to grow, although not without hiccups, at one of the fastest rates in the region.

The three issues however interplay and have a significance that extends beyond the archipelago of islands. The recent visit to Manila by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo brings this into focus.

Secretary Pompeo reassured the Philippines about the scope of the Mutual Defence treaty between the two countries, clarifying that any attack on Philippine aircraft or ships in the South China Sea would trigger a response from the United States. Such comments seek to provide reassurance when China is building military outposts in the sea.

In contrast to more ambiguous interpretations given by past US administrations, the statement was unusually clear. Yet so were the responses from his Filipino hosts.

Pompeo’s counterpart, Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin, preferred the view that, “In vagueness lies the best deterrence”. Philippine Defence Secretary Delfin Lorenzana responded that he was less worried about the lack of US assurance and worried more that the treaty might lead to a war that, “we [the Philippines] do not seek and do not want”.

Much is being made by the Manila media of the differences between the two Filipino views. Yet they are aligned when we compare them to the recent past, when the then Aquino administration had actively sought more and clearer support from America. Today, Manila is not welcoming American commitment on the South China Sea and is instead wary about being pulled into conflict.

Much of this shift is due to policies under the Duterte presidency. While the preceding administration actively pursued the South China Sea arbitration proceedings against China, Duterte has been keener to negotiate.

Personalities matter too. While both are outsize characters, Presidents Donald Trump and Duterte have not developed a good working relationship. The Americans have criticised Duterte on a number of issues, especially concerning the human rights concerns that arise from his war against drug dealers and claims of extrajudicial killings. Pompeo on this visit echoed the issues. On one hand, he tried to liken Duterte to Trump but Pompeo also echoed American concerns about human rights violations.

There is also an outstanding invitation for the Filipino president to visit the White House, which Pompeo reiterated during his visit. But this has not been taken up. American investment in the Philippines too has

The overall stock of US investment in its former colony remains considerable but new investments have slowed. The Trump administration’s move to raise import duties has been one reason for this slow down, and has been blamed for the nine-year high inflation rate that the Philippines experienced late last year.

In contrast, China’s investments and commercial interests are ramping up. The Duterte administration is emphasising a “Build, Build, Build” infrastructure programme, with an immense US$120 billion price tag. China has pledged a substantial US$24 billion investment deal and, while things are moving slower than some anticipated, there are two China-funded bridges crossing the Pasig River in Manila that are already examples of what can be delivered.

China’s investments are also growing in other sectors, especially in real-estate and gaming and gambling. These changes have a clear presence in the new reclamation project along Manila Bay, just beyond the airport. While anchored by some of the country’s large conglomerates, you feel China’s presence viscerally in the development of massive and gaudy casinos, malls and hotels.

Prices here have soared for office properties and condominiums, ahead of other areas of the city.

While some Filipinos welcome this and benefit, others are squeezed out and bemoan the development. The fear is not only that Chinese workers are taking jobs, but that some are evading taxes and committing crimes. Environmental and social concerns over the massive land reclamation on the bay add to the chorus of concern.

Yes, islands and other rocks in the South China Sea remain in contention and the US navy continues to make “freedom of navigation” patrols within areas claimed by Chinese authorities. But China has not only poured much money and sand into reclaiming the sea. The new activity and controversy are now not at sea, but onshore, and often within Manila the capital. If the US is to reclaim influence in these new dynamics, the Trump administration must do much more than talking up an old defence treaty and inviting Duterte to visit.

Simon Tay is an associate professor of international law at the National University of Singapore, and chairman of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs. This commentary was first published in the South China Morning Post on 20 March 2019.